Advanced Types
The Rust type system has some features that we’ve mentioned or used without
discussing. We started talking about the newtype pattern in regards to traits;
we’ll start with a more general discussion about why newtypes are useful as
types. We’ll then move to type aliases, a feature that is similar to newtypes
but has slightly different semantics. We’ll also discuss the !
type and
dynamically sized types.
Using the Newtype Pattern for Type Safety and Abstraction
The newtype pattern that we started discussing at the end of the “Advanced
Traits” section, where we create a new type as a tuple struct with one field
that wraps a type can also be useful for statically enforcing that values are
never confused, and is often used to indicate the units of a value. We actually
had an example of this in Listing 19-26: the Millimeters
and Meters
structs
both wrap u32
values in a new type. If we write a function with a parameter
of type Millimeters
, we won’t be able to compile a program that accidentally
tries to call that function with a value of type Meters
or a plain u32
.
Another reason to use the newtype pattern is to abstract away some
implementation details of a type: the wrapper type can expose a different
public API than the private inner type would if we used it directly in order to
restrict the functionality that is available, for example. New types can also
hide internal generic types. For example, we could provide a People
type that
wraps a HashMap<i32, String>
that stores a person’s ID associated with their
name. Code using People
would only interact with the public API we provide,
such as a method to add a name string to the People
collection, and that code
wouldn’t need to know that we assign an i32
ID to names internally. The
newtype pattern is a lightweight way to achieve encapsulation to hide
implementation details that we discussed in Chapter 17.
Type Aliases Create Type Synonyms
The newtype pattern involves creating a new struct to be a new, separate type.
Rust also provides the ability to declare a type alias with the type
keyword to give an existing type another name. For example, we can create the
alias Kilometers
to i32
like so:
type Kilometers = i32;
This means Kilometers
is a synonym for i32
; unlike the Millimeters
and
Meters
types we created in Listing 19-26, Kilometers
is not a separate, new
type. Values that have the type Kilometers
will be treated exactly the same
as values of type i32
:
type Kilometers = i32;
let x: i32 = 5;
let y: Kilometers = 5;
println!("x + y = {}", x + y);
Since Kilometers
is an alias for i32
, they’re the same type. We can add
values of type i32
and Kilometers
together, and we can pass Kilometers
values to functions that take i32
parameters. We don’t get the type checking
benefits that we get from the newtype pattern that we discussed in the previous
section.
The main use case for type synonyms is to reduce repetition. For example, we may have a lengthy type like this:
Box<Fn() + Send + 'static>
Writing this out in function signatures and as type annotations all over the place can be tiresome and error-prone. Imagine having a project full of code like that in Listing 19-35:
let f: Box<Fn() + Send + 'static> = Box::new(|| println!("hi"));
fn takes_long_type(f: Box<Fn() + Send + 'static>) {
// ...snip...
}
fn returns_long_type() -> Box<Fn() + Send + 'static> {
// ...snip...
# Box::new(|| ())
}
A type alias makes this code more manageable by reducing the amount of
repetition this project has. Here, we’ve introduced an alias named Thunk
for
the verbose type, and we can replace all uses of the type with the shorter
Thunk
as shown in Listing 19-36:
type Thunk = Box<Fn() + Send + 'static>;
let f: Thunk = Box::new(|| println!("hi"));
fn takes_long_type(f: Thunk) {
// ...snip...
}
fn returns_long_type() -> Thunk {
// ...snip...
# Box::new(|| ())
}
Much easier to read and write! Choosing a good name for a type alias can help communicate your intent as well (thunk is a word for code to be evaluated at a later time, so it’s an appropriate name for a closure that gets stored).
Another common use of type aliases is with the Result<T, E>
type. Consider
the std::io
module in the standard library. I/O operations often return a
Result<T, E>
, since their operations may fail to work. There’s a
std::io::Error
struct that represents all of the possible I/O errors. Many of
the functions in std::io
will be returning Result<T, E>
where the E
is
std::io::Error
, such as these functions in the Write
trait:
use std::io::Error;
use std::fmt;
pub trait Write {
fn write(&mut self, buf: &[u8]) -> Result<usize, Error>;
fn flush(&mut self) -> Result<(), Error>;
fn write_all(&mut self, buf: &[u8]) -> Result<(), Error>;
fn write_fmt(&mut self, fmt: fmt::Arguments) -> Result<(), Error>;
}
We’re writing Result<..., Error>
a lot. As such, std::io
has this type
alias declaration:
type Result<T> = Result<T, std::io::Error>;
Because this is in the std::io
module, the fully qualified alias that we can
use is std::io::Result<T>
; that is, a Result<T, E>
with the E
filled in
as std::io::Error
. The Write
trait function signatures end up looking like
this:
pub trait Write {
fn write(&mut self, buf: &[u8]) -> Result<usize>;
fn flush(&mut self) -> Result<()>;
fn write_all(&mut self, buf: &[u8]) -> Result<()>;
fn write_fmt(&mut self, fmt: Arguments) -> Result<()>;
}
The type alias helps in two ways: this is easier to write and it gives us a
consistent interface across all of std::io
. Because it’s an alias, it is just
another Result<T, E>
, which means we can use any methods that work on
Result<T, E>
with it, and special syntax like ?
.
The Never Type, !
, that Never Returns
Rust has a special type named !
. In type theory lingo, it’s called the empty
type, because it has no values. We prefer to call it the never type. The name
describes what it does: it stands in the place of the return type when a
function will never return. For example:
fn bar() -> ! {
// ...snip...
}
This is read as “the function bar
returns never,” and functions that return
never are called diverging functions. We can’t create values of the type !
,
so bar
can never possibly return. What use is a type you can never create
values for? If you think all the way back to Chapter 2, we had some code that
looked like this, reproduced here in Listing 19-37:
# let guess = "3";
# loop {
let guess: u32 = match guess.trim().parse() {
Ok(num) => num,
Err(_) => continue,
};
# break;
# }
At the time, we skipped over some details in this code. In Chapter 6, we
learned that match
arms must return the same type. This doesn’t work:
let guess = match guess.trim().parse() {
Ok(_) => 5,
Err(_) => "hello",
}
What would the type of guess
be here? It’d have to be both an integer and a
string, and Rust requires that guess
can only have one type. So what does
continue
return? Why are we allowed to return a u32
from one arm in Listing
19-37 and have another arm that ends with continue
?
As you may have guessed, continue
has a value of !
. That is, when Rust goes
to compute the type of guess
, it looks at both of the match arms. The former
has a value of u32
, and the latter has a value of !
. Since !
can never
have a value, Rust is okay with this, and decides that the type of guess
is
u32
. The formal way of describing this behavior of !
is that the never type
unifies with all other types. We’re allowed to end this match
arm with
continue
because continue
doesn’t actually return a value; it instead moves
control back to the top of the loop, so in the Err
case, we never actually
assign a value to guess
.
Another use of the never type is panic!
. Remember the unwrap
function that
we call on Option<T>
values to produce a value or panic? Here’s its
definition:
impl<T> Option<T> {
pub fn unwrap(self) -> T {
match self {
Some(val) => val,
None => panic!("called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value"),
}
}
}
Here, the same thing happens as in the match
in Listing 19-33: we know that
val
has the type T
, and panic!
has the type !
, so the result of the
overall match
expression is T
. This works because panic!
doesn’t produce
a value; it ends the program. In the None
case, we won’t be returning a value
from unwrap
, so this code is valid.
One final expression that has the type !
is a loop
:
print!("forever ");
loop {
print!("and ever ");
}
Here, the loop never ends, so the value of the expression is !
. This wouldn’t
be true if we included a break
, however, as the loop would terminate when it
gets to the break
.
Dynamically Sized Types & Sized
Because Rust needs to know things like memory layout, there’s a particular corner of its type system that can be confusing, and that’s the concept of dynamically sized types. Sometimes referred to as ‘DSTs’ or ‘unsized types’, these types let us talk about types whose size we can only know at runtime.
Let’s dig into the details of a dynamically sized type that we’ve been using
this whole book: str
. That’s right, not &str
, but str
on its own. str
is a DST; we can’t know how long the string is until runtime. Since we can’t
know that, we can’t create a variable of type str
, nor can we take an
argument of type str
. Consider this code, which does not work:
let s1: str = "Hello there!";
let s2: str = "How's it going?";
These two str
values would need to have the exact same memory layout, but
they have different lengths: s1
needs 12 bytes of storage, and s2
needs 15.
This is why it’s not possible to create a variable holding a dynamically sized
type.
So what to do? Well, you already know the answer in this case: the types of
s1
and s2
are &str
rather than str
. If you think back to Chapter 4, we
said this about &str
:
... it’s a reference to an internal position in the String and the number of elements that it refers to.
So while a &T
is a single value that stores the memory address of where the
T
is located, a &str
is two values: the address of the str
and how long
it is. As such, a &str
has a size we can know at compile time: it’s two times
the size of a usize
in length. That is, we always know the size of a &str
,
no matter how long the string it refers to is. This is the general way in which
dynamically sized types are used in Rust; they have an extra bit of metadata
that stores the size of the dynamic information. This leads us to the golden
rule of dynamically sized types: we must always put values of dynamically sized
types behind a pointer of some kind.
While we’ve talked a lot about &str
, we can combine str
with all kinds of
pointers: Box<str>
, for example, or Rc<str>
. In fact, you’ve already seen
this before, but with a different dynamically sized type: traits. Every trait
is a dynamically sized type we can refer to by using the name of the trait. In
Chapter 17, we mentioned that in order to use traits as trait objects, we have
to put them behind a pointer like &Trait
or Box<Trait>
(Rc<Trait>
would
work too). Traits being dynamically sized is the reason we have to do that!
The Sized
Trait
To work with DSTs, Rust has a trait that determines if a type’s size is known
at compile time or not, which is Sized
. This trait is automatically
implemented for everything the compiler knows the size of at compile time. In
addition, Rust implicitly adds a bound on Sized
to every generic function.
That is, a generic function definition like this:
fn generic<T>(t: T) {
// ...snip...
}
is actually treated as if we had written this:
fn generic<T: Sized>(t: T) {
// ...snip...
}
By default, generic functions will only work on types that have a known size at compile time. There is, however, special syntax you can use to relax this restriction:
fn generic<T: ?Sized>(t: &T) {
// ...snip...
}
A trait bound on ?Sized
is the opposite of a trait bound on Sized
; that is,
we would read this as “T
may or may not be Sized
”. This syntax is only
available for Sized
, no other traits.
Also note we switched the type of the t
parameter from T
to &T
: since the
type might not be Sized
, we need to use it behind some kind of pointer. In
this case, we’ve chosen a reference.
Next let’s talk about functions and closures!